Re: unable to define license type

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/05/2010 04:27 AM, Jiri Skala wrote:
> Hello,
> I found a license cited below during srpm review. I'm not able to define
> what kind of license is it. Could you help me with it? The source is a
> part of iputils package together with other sources/binaries. There is
> more type of licenses. Particular binaries contains sources of one
> license type. The package is used in Fedora and RHEL-6. I suppose spec
> file license definition should appear:
> 
> License: BSD with advertising and GPLv2+ and <unknown_licence>

A new license! :)

This one is Free and GPL compatible, please use:

License: BSD with advertising and GPLv2+ and Rdisc

Thanks,

~spot

_______________________________________________
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux