On 12/12/2009 07:24 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> >> Fedora's Licensing Guidelines don't use the term "effective license" >> anywhere. Not even in the section on dual licensing, which is the scenario >> where the packager may choose to pick either license for the whole >> program. >> >> There is no such thing as an "effective license" related to the Mixed >> Source Licensing Scenario [1], because re-licensing a program, such as >> converting from LGPL to GPL, is not done implicitly or automatically. >> > > Thanks but that doesn't answer my question. Are so many people just > imagining things? Why does this inconsistency exist? I'd like to have > this cleared up so we won't have to discuss the same issue over and > over again. People are just confused. The issue has already been clarified. Is there still some specific confusion? Rahul _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
