Hi all, there's proposed spec in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541744#c1 with the license which is not listed in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses ## liboping.spec -- OpenPKG RPM Package Specification ## Copyright (c) 2000-2009 OpenPKG Foundation e.V. <http://openpkg.net/> ## ## Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for ## any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that ## the above copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all ## copies. ## ## THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED ``AS IS'' AND ANY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED ## WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF ## MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. ## IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS AND COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND THEIR ## CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, ## SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT ## LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF ## USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ## ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, ## OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT ## OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF ## SUCH DAMAGE. ## Would this be allowed in Fedora? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#License_of_Fedora_SPEC_Files says Fedora CLA is default but it also says "(unless otherwise explicitly licensed)" Cheers, Alan _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
