On 10/06/2009 02:46 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 02:14:12PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: >> On 10/06/2009 02:01 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: >>> We need this license to be compatible with inclusion in works produced >>> by Fedora Docs, and in works that incorporate content from the Fedora >>> wiki, right? If CC0 can coexist peacefully in that role with the new >>> CC licensing used in both those cases, it does seem like the best >>> contender. >> >> Assuming that the CC licensing is "CC-BY-SA" (Attribution Share-Alike), >> right? >> >> I've asked Red Hat Legal here, just to make sure my instincts are right. > > Correct, the Docs project is switching to CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2009-October/msg00001.html Yeah, neither I nor Red Hat Legal sees any problem with using the CC-Zero license in conjunction with CC-BY-SA, as described previously in this thread. ~spot _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
