On Sun, 2009-08-16 at 13:32 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 08/16/2009 08:15 AM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > > Yes, I do understand that part. :) I was simply correcting the point > > that the MS Shared Source License was in any way acceptable for Fedora > > (it is not). > > > > The MS Public License is acceptable for Fedora, Free but GPL > > incompatible. I'm adding it to the table now. > > Can you let me know why it is GPL incompatible? > > Rahul > IANAL, but perhaps: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0-standalone.html#section11
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
