"Christofer C. Bell" <christofer.c.bell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Joerg > Schilling<Joerg.Schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Or in other words, you have no arguments. > > > > If you have any valid arguments you are welcome. As long as you don't, I see > > no way to continue the discussion as it will not take us any further. > > http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/gpl-compatible.html I'm sure you can You are funny - you just quote another piece of FUD. Do you have any real argument? So far, none of the answering persons did send any useful argument. This seems to verify that you don't have any arguments to prove your claims or that you are unable or unwilling to have a fact based discussion. The real bad thing I see from this mail exchange is that there seem to be many people in this list that ignore the demands from the users of the code and that don't care that the users get defective and undistributable code although there is perfectly legal and working original code. The way you do the discussion lets me believe that you are unimportant and not the right person to talk to. You continue to send no facts. This sems to verify that you know that you are unable to prove your claim that there is a proble with the license of the original code. If you continue with this personal opinion, I expect you to give an explanation. Is there no RedHat lawyer in this list? Is there no people interested in OSS on this list? Jörg -- EMail:joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (uni) joerg.schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list