Frank Murphy <frankly3d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 12/06/09 21:33, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > > The rest contains a lot of accusations but not a single legal proof. > > > > Please read the relvent information I did provide already, see e.g.: > > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-June/msg00017.html > > > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-June/msg00019.html > http://lists.gpl-violations.org/pipermail/legal/2007-July/001065.html > > This message is from a lawyer. You are mistaken: Patent attorneys are not lawyers. The article you quoted in addition does not contain useful or valid legal theories. It just quotes a claim written by a laymen. Please read this: http://www.rosenlaw.com/Rosen_Ch06.pdf It gives valid legal theories for all claims and it explains why there is no problem. Jörg -- EMail:joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (uni) joerg.schilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
