Re: EUPL v1.1 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/29/2009 12:40 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:

> Assuming that the EUPL v1.1 remains unacceptable, can someone e.g. dual
> licence something as EUPL v1.X and say LGPLv2 in order to make it
> acceptable for us.

If a software is dual licensed and if any one of them is acceptable to
Fedora, the software will be permitted in Fedora (ie) if EUPL v1.x is
not acceptable, then we would accept it in Fedora under the LGPLv2 license.

Rahul

_______________________________________________
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux