I'm reviewing Djblets: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 which is a utility library used by ReviewBoard [1] The upstream website: http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/Djblets states "Djblets is under the MIT license." However, the upstream tarball does not contain a license file. Only some of the files within the tarball contain license headers. I believe that every file with a "Copyright" also contains an MIT license grant. (There's also an embedded copy of jquery, which is dual licensed MIT and GPL) The setup.py does state "MIT" in the license field, in the usual place for such metadata (although said file is itself GPLv2 licensed). Is this a problem for Fedora inclusion? Thanks Dave [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
