Re: License check for new library for fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/5/5 Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 05/01/2009 01:14 PM, Thomas Janssen wrote:
>> Good day.
>>
>> I try to become a new packager for Fedora and face a license that
>> needs to be checked.
>> The Main package is Newsbeuter MIT/X license and the needed lib is
>> "stfl" with a LGPLv3 license, supplemented by additional permissions.
>
> Thomas,
>
> The stfl library is licensed under the normal LGPLv3 license (its
> actually LGPLv3+). I think the thing that confused you is where the
> LGPLv3 license text says:
>
> " This version of the GNU Lesser General Public License incorporates
> the terms and conditions of version 3 of the GNU General Public
> License, supplemented by the additional permissions listed below."

Yes, that confused me :) Sorry, new packager, trying to make everything correct.

> The LGPLv3 is just the GPLv3 with some extra permission grants. The stfl
> upstream did not modify the LGPLv3 at all. :) So, it is fine for Fedora.

Yippiieee, thank you :)

Have a good day :)

-- 
LG Thomas

Dubium sapientiae initium

_______________________________________________
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux