On 04/15/2009 01:14 PM, Jerry James wrote: > Here is the NIST license for another piece of their software, SCTK. > It says that the software is public domain, but also includes an > explicit disclaimer. Is that still "Public Domain" for spec file > purposes? Yes. Works commissioned by employees of the US government are automatically public domain, so this is fine. > Incidentally, there's yet another of those broken "AS IS" clauses here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Old_Style_with_legal_disclaimer_3 There is nothing wrong with disclaiming warranty in a FOSS license, in fact, it is generally a pretty good idea. ~spot _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
