Tom "spot" Callaway píše v Čt 26. 03. 2009 v 06:35 -0400: > On 03/25/2009 06:48 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > I've found a package that contains a a library intended to be shimmed > > into the system with LD_PRELOAD. The library itself is under the CPL > > license. Are there any troubling issues surrounding dynamic linking of a > > CPL-licensed library in this manner? > > > > My take on this is that we couldn't link CPL code with, say, GPL code > > together and distribute the resulting binary, but when the end user > > performs that linking by setting LD_PRELOAD and running a binary, they > > aren't distributing the result so there's no license violation. It's > > all pretty much beyond me, though. > > Any chance I can see the package in question? The preloaded library is src_vipa.so from s390utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458826 https://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=23348 Dan _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
