Hi all; This is in regards to an attempt to package figlet[1] for Fedora. It turns out that part of this package[2] is under a non-free license. Attempts to contact the author of this code have been thus far unsuccessful, and I'm wondering as to the best way to proceed. The license currently in place on these files indicate that any changes to the code needs to be emailed to the original author within 30 days. Would this cover licensing changes as well? I'm wondering if we could just change the license on this code, notify the author via the email address provided and call it good (the author's email address isn't bouncing, but appears to be inactive). Another alternative would be to have upstream replace the code with sufficiently free code, or to remove the functionality completely. I am also considering patching out the non-free code myself (since upstream doesn't really have an active maintainer right now as figlet has been pretty stable for years) and doing the release that way. The functionality in question is for decompressing font files which we could easily live without. Could I get some thoughts on the above from this list? Thanks, Ray [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489830 [2]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489830#c8 _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
