On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Michel Salim wrote: > >> CeCILL-B (BSD) is like the BSD license with advertising, which I guess >> rules it out from Fedora. > > It does not. > >> Could the legal team look into this? The license is INRIA-originated, >> so it's possible that in the future, more INRIA software (such as >> Bigloo, already in Fedora) might switch over. >> > > Cecill is already listed at > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing > I must be blind. Thanks. I'll let upstream knows -- AFAIK they are using Scheme2Js as a component in something that is currently GPL-licensed, and CeCILL-C is listed as *in*compatible with GPLv2. Is there any more information about the reason CeCILL-C conflicts with GPL? For B it's the advertising clause, I guess. Thanks, -- miʃel salim • http://hircus.jaiku.com/ IUCS • msalim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora • salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx MacPorts • hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
