Hello, Upstream for a package I just submitted for review, Scheme2Js (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487938) has indicated that the license is switching from GPL+ to CeCILL-C (v2): http://www.cecill.info/licences.en.html CeCILL itself is free and GPL-compatible, and is FSF-approved, though there's no clarification about whether this is GPLv2 or GPLv3: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#SoftwareLicenses CeCILL-C (component) is claimed to be LGPL-compatible, though I'm not sure if FSF approves it as well, or just the main CeCILL license (and again, version 2, 3 or both). CeCILL-B (BSD) is like the BSD license with advertising, which I guess rules it out from Fedora. Could the legal team look into this? The license is INRIA-originated, so it's possible that in the future, more INRIA software (such as Bigloo, already in Fedora) might switch over. Thanks, -- miʃel salim • http://hircus.jaiku.com/ IUCS • msalim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora • salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx MacPorts • hircus@xxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
