Hi Jason, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > CK> Otherwise the package contains only GPLv3+ source. I have two > CK> questions: What would be the correct License: entry in the spec > CK> file? > > "GPLv3+ and MIT" if the MIT-licensed data files are included directly > into the package; I suppose just GPLv3+ if they are somehow compiled > into a binary with the GPL code. If the former, also include a > comment in the spec indicating which files are under which license. > See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines for > more info Thank you very much for the information. I've updated the spec accordingly. I'm looking forward that somebody reviews my new package. ;-) Best regards, Christian _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
