Hi,
I'm currently preparing a package ("anki") for inclusion which has one
file which falls under the "UNICODE, INC. LICENSE AGREEMENT - DATA FILES
AND SOFTWARE" license available here:
http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html#Exhibit1 . Otherwise the package
contains only GPLv3+ source.
I have two questions:
1. What would be the correct License: entry in the spec file?
2. Is it necessary to provide the full text of this license? The
original source only mentions the URL above. If yes: in both src.rpm and
the binary rpm?
Best regards,
Christian
_______________________________________________
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
