I've read the FAQ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#What_does_it_mean_when_a_license_is_listed_as_.22GPLv2_compat.22_or_.22GPLv3_compatible.22.3F but I'm unclear what it means if a license is *IN*compatible with the GPL. As an example, suppose I have a program which is GPLv2+, and it requires a library which is (for example) APSL2.0. Is the linking permitted? Can I distribute the result as a binary (with an offer of source) or do end-users have to link it themselves? Is there a difference between dynamic and static linking? More generally about the licenses with "NO" in the GPL* Compat columns here, what does that stop me from doing? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Software_License_List Rich. -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
