On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 15:34 -0500, Luis Villa wrote: > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 15:06 +0000, Caolán McNamara wrote: > >> Here's one I hadn't be aware of before, the EUPL, European Union Public > >> Licence: http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/eupl which affects something I was > >> considering packaging. It does have in it an explicit ... > > > > This one is non-free, due to Article 13 (which says): > > > > The European Commission may put into force translations and/or > > binding new versions of this Licence, so far [sic] this is required > > and reasonable. New versions of the Licence will be published with a > > unique version number. The new version of the Licence becomes > > binding for You as soon as You become aware of its publication. > > <snip> > > Note that, according to discussions between the authors and OSI, EUPL > 1.1 is in the pipeline, which should resolve this issue (and some > others raised by OSI) such that it should be acceptable to Fedora. > (Ironically, because of this clause, at that time anything released > under EUPL 1.0 should also become acceptable to Fedora ;) Ideal, thanks for letting us know. ~spot _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
