"Tom "spot" Callaway" writes: > So, the problem here is that the BSD license has the advertising clause, > which makes it incompatible with GPL. You will need to get the copyright > holders of the code under that BSD license to drop the advertising > clause. I'd strongly suggest trying to work with upstream for this. I see. I was mostly wondering about the BSD-like licenses not being exactly BSD. I didn't think about this aspect. I will contact the developers, but I fear this might take a while. ttf2pt1 isn't very actively developed. (Latest release from 2003. Let's call it "mature".) The script with a GPL license isn't really used by the main program. It is from a separate developer and merely bundled together in the tar archive for some user's convenience. (And might only be useful on SUSE anyway, according to the comments.) Could I avoid this problem by not including these scripts in the package instead? ttf2pt1 proper would not loose anything. Or would this not help, since the SRPM would include the tar archive where the different files are bundled? _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
