Re: Re: MeepZor Consulting Public Licence (MCPL) - good or bad?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 20:44 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> On 01/05/2008 Robert Scheck wrote:
> > looks like a normal free license to me.
> 
> It looks that way to me, but the wording is unique in a few parts, and
> I'm not sure it if is GPL compatible or not.
> 
> If I had to guess, I would say Free and GPLv2/v3 Compatible, but I'd
> rather let the FSF pass judgement. :)

This one came back as non-free. I spoke to the author of the license,
and he's moved the code that used it to Apache 2.0:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/clarke

~spot

_______________________________________________
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux