Pkg naming question "vixie-cron-ng" vs. 3-clause BSD license

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Im currently reviewing the "vixie-cron-ng" package (#428007) which is an
enhanced vixie-cron (which is licensed "MIT and BSD") we forked. I'm a
bit unsure if naming the fork that way is allowed in the light of the
3rd BSD clause:

 * 3. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its
contributors
 *    may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this
software
 *    without specific prior written permission.

The problem I see is that "vixie" is the name of Paul Vixie, the main
contributor and I could imagine that this would be seen as endorsing or
promoting "the product" with his name.

Comments?

Thanks,
Nils
-- 
     Nils Philippsen    /    Red Hat    /    nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
 Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."  --  B. Franklin, 1759
 PGP fingerprint:  C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F  656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011

_______________________________________________
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux