Re: Pkg naming question "vixie-cron-ng" vs. 3-clause BSD license

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 18:28 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Im currently reviewing the "vixie-cron-ng" package (#428007) which is an
> enhanced vixie-cron (which is licensed "MIT and BSD") we forked. I'm a
> bit unsure if naming the fork that way is allowed in the light of the
> 3rd BSD clause:
> 
>  * 3. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its
> contributors
>  *    may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this
> software
>  *    without specific prior written permission.
> 
> The problem I see is that "vixie" is the name of Paul Vixie, the main
> contributor and I could imagine that this would be seen as endorsing or
> promoting "the product" with his name.

Interesting. You should probably ask Paul Vixie if you can get his
written permission.

~spot

_______________________________________________
Fedora-legal-list mailing list
Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux