-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 11:36 +0100, Giancarlo Niccolai wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hello, I have submitted the Falcon package for review and >> inclusion at >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428603 >> >> I will clear the rpmlint report later today. >> >> The Falcon Programming Language is released under FPLL: this is >> mainly an Apache2 license modified to extend the openness of the >> license to the embedding application and to the scripts. Here I >> am submitting the license to fedora-legal for approval. > > I've passed this on to the FSF's lawyers for review. > > ~spot Hello; I have reached an agreement with Debian about double licensing; I will distribute Falcon there as GPL or FPLL as the user wish. I have been provided with documentation and samples on how to accomplish this. I didn't have news for some while from Fedora, witch accepted the package with the exception of the license. If I repackage with double licensing, would this clear the package for release? TIA, Giancarlo Niccolai. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH6VkI5nwsoBIDC4YRAk94AJ9MCq4NNgOCZudZHr7eV5bmc7Kl+QCgmU4m lawOE0VfMWkI6IHjaRgI78Q= =GAs3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
