On Jan 19, 2008 5:47 AM, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 11:36 +0100, Giancarlo Niccolai wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hello, > > I have submitted the Falcon package for review and inclusion at > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428603 > > > > I will clear the rpmlint report later today. > > > > The Falcon Programming Language is released under FPLL: this is mainly > > an Apache2 license modified to extend the openness of the license to > > the embedding application and to the scripts. Here I am submitting the > > license to fedora-legal for approval. > > I've passed this on to the FSF's lawyers for review. > Spot, Any news on that review? It seems to me that if the only divergence from ASL 2.0 is the *granting* of additional rights, then the only worry should be that of a Falcon-licensed application linking to an incompatibly-licensed library (which the Falcon interpreter does not). Thanks, -- Michel Salim http://hircus.jaiku.com/ _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
