On Wednesday 29 November 2006 21:37, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:33:59AM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > > I would rephrase it in a positive way: Legacy is merged with Core and > > Extras under one umbrella redefining EOL time marks. E.g. there is a > > shorter total lifespan, but during that lifespan there is more > > manpower assigned to get timely security fixes out. > > > > The current compromise is that FL was extending Fedora by 12 months, > > where now it will be only 4 additional months. Reviving FL in these > > terms would mean to try to extend a couple more months. But let's give > > that new model a new chance first and measure demand and available > > manpower after the first implementation of this model. > > Sounds good. I think the important thing, though, is to state clearly that > FC3, FC4, and before are effectively unsupported *right now*. I think this would be best. Legacy was an experiment that worked for a period of time and has overtime worked less and less. Interest has waned as well as willingness to participate. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpEWgCJMKxIO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
