On Wednesday 15 November 2006 15:34, Matthew Miller wrote: > Clearly I'm in no position to impose anything. However, it'd certainly be > helpful to us if Legacy could contine to extend the lifespan beyond the new > proposed 13 months. And I mention it in case I'm not alone. [*] > > > > > * In fact, I'm pretty certain I'm not, and that there are thousands of > users running FC1, FC2, and FC3 and just waiting to become botnet members > if they're not already. The difference is that my users have me to care > about them. But is there enough "you" to go around to do the updates? That's the real question here. We can't stop people from being dumb and not upgrading their release when it goes dead. If we gave them 2 years, they'd take it and still not upgrade and then what? I think the Fedora project is really trying to reach a reasonable amount of time that it can throw its entire support behind. The Legacy folks of past and present are totally awesome, and we could really use their knowledge and eagerness to help in perhaps more productive fashions. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpr3XdsJyhdU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-legacy-list mailing list fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
