-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 09 June 2006 23:53, Jesse Keating wrote: > As we approach FC6 Test2, we should make a decision wrt RHL7.3/9 and > FC1/2. We've been supporting these releases for a while now, and > they've grown pretty long in the tooth, even by Legacy standards. Our > lifetime policy would dictate that FC1 should be gone already, and FC2 > would go when we pick up FC4, so that we're only supporting FC3 and FC4. > The RHL releases are a different matter. > (...) In my case, I still have a a limited of systems running RHL 7.3, with no FC-x on-site. All but two are going down before the end of the summer. The plan is to eventually move those two remaining servers to RHEL. If FedoraLegacy drops support to RHL 7.3, I'll need some time (and documentation) to migrate those systems. Rushing systems migration is not a good idea. Regards, Josep - -- Josep L. Guallar-Esteve - IT Department -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEjZSGSGQa4/zQ9e8RAi7ZAJwIq5dLExynN0EijQwIen39dHn8rwCgoU14 zwxqTP1/VGKxc0uGc8WWWgk= =FIul -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
