On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Jesse Keating wrote:
RHL we agreed to support for a long period of time, however that time
may be up. Personally I would really like to see these go, as they take
up a lot of our time when trying to push updates, we get very little
help, and updates are increasingly more difficult to do. I would like
to hear discussion on if we should continue supporting it, how we can
make it easier to support, and a reasonable endpoint to the support, an
exit strategy.
...
FWIW, my only interest (because that's what we still use in many
places) in Fedora Legacy is RHL73 and RHL9. I don't think I'd be able
to use time to help FL if FL was focusing on only FC.
But given the tradeoffs and that support needs to get dropped in any
case sooner or later, doing so might be a good idea if RHL versions
cause too much fuss, e.g., with new CVS infrastructures or such.
--
Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
