On 3/28/06, Ralph Bearpark <rbearpark.nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I am left wondering if this sendmail patch actually wiped virtusertable.db. I can now confirm that my virtusertable.db was somehow regenerated - erroneously - when the sendmail patch was installed. I restored the virtusertable.db from last night's backup (after the patch was installed) and I see it bears the approximate timestamp of the patch installation (see the _postpatch file below, mv-ed to make way for the new, correct virtusertable.db file). -rw-r----- 1 root root 24576 Mar 28 22:04 virtusertable.db -rw-r----- 1 root root 12288 Mar 27 19:07 virtusertable.db_postpatch So, why did this patch need to regenerate the virtusertable.db? And if it really did have to, then wtf did it have to do it incorrectly? As it is, I dread to think how many of my regular maillists are now halted due to the senders receiving "no such user" responses. Regards, Ralph. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
