On 3/28/06, Pekka Savola <pekkas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Ralph Bearpark wrote: > > Do I get my config file from backup? Or re-do m4? Or await a new > > patch? Or what? > > > > A clear statement of advice - either here in the maillist or under > > advisories (http://www.fedoralegacy.org/updates/FC1/) would be very > > welcome/necessary. > > If you could test with the packages at: > > http://turbosphere.fedoralegacy.org/logs/fedora-1-core/69-sendmail-8.12.11-4.25.3.legacy/ > > , and report success/failure, it would be very helpful. Sorry, but I was more concentrated on getting my system running again ASAP. I restored the sendmail.mc and sendmail.cf files from my backup and was surprised to find them unchanged post-patch. It seems the patch didn't actually change these config files (contrary to reports hereabouts). Then I looked into the virtusertable. I did a new makemap of the virtusertable.db and was surprised when the catch-all addresses started to work again. I am left wondering if this sendmail patch actually wiped virtusertable.db. But why would it do that? Regards, Ralph. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
