On Fri, 2006-03-03 at 15:43 -0500, James Kosin wrote: > If you have a x86_64 system and want to test the builds that are there > and say yea or no on the packages then go right ahead. But, until we > are sure they don't break anything we can't officially say yes to this. This really comes down to lack of verbosity on my part. I think it went something like this: <builder> Hey I noticed our new buildsystem we're testing is kicking out x86_64 packages. Neat. <me> Yeah, thats one of the main reasons why we're looking at this. <builder> The 32bit stuff is looking really good and we're going to publish this update as built by the new system. Should we include the x86_64 package? <me> ... um... Sure why not? <community> Hey, I see this release announcement mentions x86_64, cool! But the packages aren't on the server, wtf? <me> oh crap! I guess I actually have to do some work to get x86_64 published, let me fix that.... <community> hey there they are cool. So is this official? <me> ... um.... (; -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
