Quoting seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> 5) Some other reason or reasons?
>
> To further make our selves seem as a project of the same level as the
> Extras or Documentation project, by existing in the same spaces that
> they do.
I personally think we are lowering ourselves to their level, but so be it.
Not my call.
'lowering ourselves'
You might need a reality check if you think that legacy is 'lowering
itself' to the level of extras.
-sv
Only in the sense of web site presence and presentation, not in the
sense of community involvement, output/productivity, or many other
areas where it clearly outshines FL.
But then, our web presence has never been good anyway, since no one will
participate in the process. I proposed an updated overview years ago, and
have received basically no feedback of any sort, and no go-ahead to implement
it, and any attempt to get it approved has failed.
So if this "community" can't even be bothered to look at and approve or
reject a document that is supposed to describe its existance and purpose,
I guess it isn't much of a project. Maybe the nay-sayers are right.
Maybe the project is crap, and we're all just wasting our time on it.
Certainly is the least satisfying project I've ever been involved with.
--
Eric Rostetter
The Department of Physics
The University of Texas at Austin
Go Longhorns!
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
