On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 21:49 -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote: > Fedora itself does not do it this way. I'd rather we didn't either. > I do recognize that the other Fedora Community Projects do, but I don't > consider us to be the same level as most of them. We're considering doing away with the fedora.redhat.com website. 1) It ties Fedora uneccessarily to Red Hat, 2) it takes a lot of effort to change something there. With the new content management stuff going online for fedoraproject.org we may see fedora.redhat.com become just a link to this. Still being discussed AFAIK. > I suppose you could compare us with the Fedora Documentation Project > at best, not the Extras Project. And they do maintain web pages as > well as wiki pages. In fact, they only caved and went to wiki pages > due to user input for various things to be in wiki (instead of requiring > knowledge of XML, etc). I don't we have the same problem, and we've had > wiki since (more or less) the start unlike the Documentation Project, > so... I'm working on getting us to the level that Extras is. We now are a true subproject, I chair the project to the Fedora Foundation / board, same way that Extras is. We're getting closer to using Fedora CVS for our sources, and using a build system like Fedora Extras. What else keeps us from being of the same level? -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
