On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 13:36 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > Do you mean that one from August? > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-748.html > CAN ids between that one and > http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14088/info > do not agree although the latest worm descriptions would suggest > that RHSA-2005:748-05 is the correct one. Seems that 2005-748 superceeded 2005-564. Same bug text, I wonder if it was an enhanced patch or another discovery. Either way we should base our package from 748 and backport all that our current packages don't have. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
