On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 11:22:28AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 14:12 -0500, Josep L. Guallar-Esteve wrote: > > http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14088/info > > http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_136821.htm > > http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-5938475.html > > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1882889,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03129TX1K0000616 > > http://news.com.com/New+worm+targets+Linuxsystems/2100-7349_3-5938475.html?part=rss&tag=5938475&subj=news > > http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/11/08/140203&tid=220&tid=106 > > Does look like we need to patch this. RHEL issued an update, Do you mean that one from August? https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-748.html CAN ids between that one and http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14088/info do not agree although the latest worm descriptions would suggest that RHSA-2005:748-05 is the correct one. Michal -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
