On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 14:37 -0400, Jeff Sheltren wrote: > Notice there are separate repo files for base, updates, updates- > testing and utils. I think this goes better with the new yum.repos.d > format than having only one repo file. Also, both base and updates > are enabled, testing and utils are not enabled by default. I think > this is a sane and safe default, but I'm open to suggestions. > > When building for FC5, we'll need to disable all repos by default. I > will proceed with that package once we all (or most) agree on this > one :) I never did like all the extra repo files for each repository. I liked the idea of one file per family, so there was one file for say freshrpms, one for atrpms, one for extras, one for core/updates, one for Legacy. Each having sub-repos such as testing/devel/whatever. But thats just my opinion. Easier to edit one file than 4. Fedora steering folks tell me that I can go w/ what I prefer. Thoughts? -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
