Josep L. Guallar-Esteve wrote:
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 11:21, James Kosin wrote:
I'm not knocking RedHat, Fedora or Fedora-Legacy this is a good
point. But, some of us need more than just patches to get us by.
I know, If you really want the latest, why not update to FC4... The
problem there is that this is a server. I shouldn't have to strip the
system down and rebuild it every 6-months or so.
Exactly. This is why Fedora Core is not recomended for production server
usage. For home server, sure, works good like anty other distributution. But
for enterprise-grade server... no way.
I also don't have
the money or budget to spend lots of money on RedHat ES.
Then I strongly recommed you to try out CentOS. CentOS is the "free as in
beer" version of RHEL. CentOS is the result of recompiling the freely
available sourfes of RHEL.
So do I. See centos@xxxxxxxxxx via
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
There's also an announce I subscribe to. I'm probably going to hop
from FC2 to CentOS one day.
Lots of really good folk over there.
[snip]
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
