Michal Jaegermann wrote:
Personally I think that if a "release early, release often"
principle would be applied to Legacy releases too, with a quick
re-release to follow for an occasional dud (which happened anyway),
we would be much further in the whole project.
Hear, hear. Amen brother. If it's not clear, I comletely agree with
Michal. An occasional possible broken release is better than no release
at all.
And please no separate repo for timed-out packages. That's even worse.
-- Rex
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
