On Sunday 24 July 2005 22:30, Jesse Keating wrote: >On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 21:28 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: >> I can, the srcs are there, or I can move them over and have >> version matching till the next amanda snapshot comes out, but the >> puzzle is why the non-compressed backups failed, while the >> compressed ones worked. Non-compressed tells me gzip isn't a >> factor. And, to top it off, the normal printout of results amanda >> does for me, didn't print until I investigated after getting an >> email from amcheck that there appeared to be another instance of >> amdump running, or I needed to run amcleanup. Since amdump, nor >> any of its slaves were running, I ran the cleanup script, and then >> got the printout and the email telling me what had failed. >> >> Me confused, and goes off to wait till tonights run & see if it >> repeats. > >Oh whoops. I thought you said non-compressed worked and compressed >didn't. My bad. See what happens tonight. And I just looked at the emailed report, and the printout, and everything worked just fine last night. I don't *think* it was a case of PEBKAC, but thats first time in many moons that its missfired since I went to virtual tapes on a big hard drive. That yum update did not take place while amanda was running. I suppose the next time it happens, I will have forgotten about waiting for the other shoe to drop. Isn't there a Murphy's Law corollary about that? :-) -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.35% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
