Re: changes are needed, we need keep moving

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Kenneth Porter wrote:
With regards to verifying packages, there are several waiting for a
verify on FC1 or FC2 that I would not feel comfortable verifying because
I do not (or never have) used them, e.g. PostgreSQL, rp-pppoe,
squirrelmail, gftp, ethereal. Obviously if this is true of all verifiers
then this is a problem that will block their release.

Was just looking at <http://www.fedoralegacy.org/wiki/index.php/QaTesting> and see that all the Bugzilla links still point to fedora.us.

This should be fixed...

Is there a query that will give all packages awaiting QA for a given releasever? Or should I just check the appropriate updates-testing repo?

Yes, but the queries are pretty complex. These pick that stuff from the bugzilla for you:

http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/buglist.html (all)
http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/buglist-rhl73.html
http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/buglist-rhl9.html
http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/buglist-core1.html
http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/buglist-fc2.html

As pointed out earlier, the release differentiation is only done for packages waiting for VERIFY or PUBLISH votes.

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux