Jason Lim wrote: > I actually think providing legacy updates for the FC releases is going to > implode sooner or later, since there are not enough people to keep > supporting so many releases as they come out and the release maintainers > and others are going to burn out.. In my opinion, doing the per-release bug split that has been discussed here before would help. That way releases that do not have sufficient interest or people working on them will not hold-up getting updates out for other releases. We could look at releases that do not show enough interest (e.g.: no activity for the release in bugzilla for a long time), and drop support for those releases if there is not sufficient resources to maintain them. > I think focusing on legacy for Redhat 9 > would make far more sense, and seems the main reason the majority are > using FedoraLegacy.org anyway. I don't know about that. There are plenty of folks working on RHL7.3 as well (myself included) :). I have QA'd a number of RH9 and FC1 packages over the past week *ONLY* becuase I needed to do it to get security fixes for 7.3 released :). Regards, Michael Schout -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
