Brian Morrison wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2005 13:01:43 -0400 in 42862EF7.4020500@xxxxxxxxxx Al Sera <alberto.sera@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dan Williams wrote:
On Sat, 14 May 2005, Al Sera wrote:
Basically the update is showing conflicts for mostly header files
from >the lesstif-devel-0.93.36-3 package. I wonder if anyone is
having this >same problem. Following is a copy of the "yum update" attempt. >
I am hoping this is the correct method to report the issue. If not,
I >apologize... and please advise with the correct method. Best regards. [ars].
Well, since OpenMotif and lesstif provide the same thing, a Motif-compatible toolkit. So I'd expect that their -devel packages would conflict. You'll probably have to remove either lesstif or openmotif.
But, if both these packages are in the RH9 Legacy repository, this should get fixed in Legacy, since packages in the same repo should not conflict.
Dan
Looks to me like lesstif is not registered in the RH9 legacy repository. A "yum list lesstif" shows it in my RH9 box but not as an available package from the RH9 Legacy repository. So I guess I need to remove one and stick with the other. Since I am maintaining my box with Legacy updates, I'll stick with openmotif and will remove lesstif... unless anyone had any other suggestions. Thanks for the quick feedback. [ars].
No, lesstif is an RH9 package, not an RH9 legacy pacvkage.
I have both installed on my system, the versions are the same as yours.
rpm -ql for each package shows no clash of files as the headers are in different paths.
I don't understand why you're having this problem unless you have rebuilt from source rpms with modified paths specified.
I have never rebuilt from source or explicitly installed either package myself. This is weird. Not that it might mean anything, but this box started a few years ago at RHL 7.2 and was upgraded single step incrementally all the way to RHL 9 through time. [ars].
Now this one got more spooky...
I just forced each install of the other packages (non-openmotif) manually, one at at a time using "yum -C update <pkgname>" and then just for grins did a "yum -C update" to force to look at cache with the last package left (openmotif). openmotif installed fine !!!
[root]# yum -C update
Gathering header information file(s) from server(s)
Server: Red Hat Linux 9 - i386 - Base
Server: Red Hat Linux 9 - i386 - Fedora Legacy utilities
Server: Red Hat Linux 9 - i386 - Updates
Finding updated packages
Downloading needed headers
Resolving dependencies
Dependencies resolved
I will do the following:
[update: openmotif-devel 2.2.2-14.2.legacy.i386]
[update: openmotif 2.2.2-14.2.legacy.i386]
[update: openmotif21 2.1.30-8.0.9.2.legacy.i386]
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Running test transaction:
Test transaction complete, Success!
openmotif 100 % done 1/6
openmotif21 100 % done 2/6
openmotif-devel 100 % done 3/6
Completing update for openmotif-devel - 4/6
Completing update for openmotif - 5/6
Completing update for openmotif21 - 6/6
Updated: openmotif-devel 2.2.2-14.2.legacy.i386 openmotif 2.2.2-14.2.legacy.i386 openmotif21 2.1.30-8.0.9.2.legacy.i386
Transaction(s) Complete
[root]#
Go figure... [ars].
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
