On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 12:29:47AM -0400, Marc Deslauriers wrote: > 1- It's a lot more work (and we're short on volunteers as it is...) Then we need to try and get infrastructure into place to make it not be a lot more work. Can you help me figure out exactly where the more work might be? Multiple bugzilla entries will be a bit more work, but because of the clone bug feature, I don't think it's a lot more. And there's a little more work on the mail announcement front, but that's mostly templates and cutting and pasting anyway. I know any amount of added work can be a *lot* when it's a short-staffed volunteer project, but I'm really a strong believer in the rewards of this one. > 2- We'll get a ton of "When is the rhl9 update coming out?" and "Where > can I download the FC1 update?" e-mails. And now we'll have somewhere to point them. :) Now, if one update is really basically available but the others aren't, it's some amount of work to look through a bug's history and figure that out. I think that simplifying that will make it easier to bring more people into working on QA. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://www.mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> Current office temperature: 80 degrees Fahrenheit. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
