Re: wiki broken?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 12:27 -0600, Eric Rostetter wrote:
> > Can you give us the reasons it seems like a good idea to you?  If I
> > know
> > why you want to do it, then maybe I'd agree with you.
> 
> Fedora Project website is a central place for Fedora stuff, and Legacy
> is a fedora stuff.

Weak argument, but I can accept it.

> The hardware will be better maintained and software
> has more people looking after it.  It is already setup for user auth, so
> random spamming will be less of an issue.

This sounds like a win.
 
> Also, docs we come up with, and docs other groups come up with can be
> linked and reused within the same system making collaboration a bit
> easier.

A big win.

> > I'd also want more details about the actual implementation before I
> > commented
> > on it.  Would it be a separate "virtual" wiki?  Or a tree in their
> > wiki?
> > What would the url be? etc.
> 
> We're working on these details right now.

As long as the url to the FL wiki stuff is easy to remember, then I'm on board.
I'd give this a qualified yes vote.

>  I would like to include you
> on the email conversations I have regarding this.

Fine.

-- 
Eric Rostetter

--

fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Fedora General Discussion]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite Questions]

  Powered by Linux