Jim Popovitch wrote:
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 10:16 -0500, Marcus Lauer wrote:This from a newbie and another lurker who has not made a single contribution to FL.
I think that's why Mr. Rostetter suggested that you make a
list. The "discussion" was such a mess that maybe a nice clear list of
what you'd like to see done would help.
OK, good point. I have been overly critical, and a lot of that is directed towards what appears to me to be apathy, so shame on me for not being more detailed. I will take the task of trying to define a structure and associated responsibilities list. This may take a few days, but the weekend is coming up. Everyone please feel free to pass on your opinions on what you think is needed or what isn't needed and I will try to release a plan over the weekend.
-Jim P.
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
I suggest that you think in terms of working up a sturcture and associated responsibilities list PROPOSAL rahter than a definition.
Speaking bluntly, reading all of the exchanges on the subject thread leaves me with one overriding impression - that you want to be King.
Getting started helping with the project is not the easiest thing in the world to do. (But, it is far from the hardest either.)
I find no basis in fact for your assertions that FL misleads people. Had I been on the receiving end of many of your remarks, I would have invited you to stuff your opinions where the sun don't shine.
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
