On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 10:10 -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote: > That's funny, some of those are the very things I *have* already > listed. > I guess you were too busy complaining about me complaining to have > noticed. No, we noticed, and we didn't disagree that some of the things you wanted would be nice. What we disagree with is the attitude you show, and the idea you have below... > I did say that there needed to be more structure, and I asked Jesse to > NOT work on future builds until he set this up. I hope you mean me personally, and not the Legacy project. Stopping everything just to build infrastructure is completely insane. As I've stated before, I haven't worked on a build for close to a year, so this above is a moot point. > I did ask for better documentation about the processes and procedures, > and not just better docs but more clarification so that more people > can > actually do things to help out Help us clarify. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (http://geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (http://www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (http://geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
