All I'm saying is this: Put the truth on the website. If FL isn't meant to be relied upon, nor if it isn't meant to be used in production systems, nor if it isn't suppose to be quality support for EOL'ed RH systems... just put the truth on the website so that visitors have correct data.
It's meant to be _community support_.
It seems to me that this following paragraph from the website should be removed:
"The goal of The Fedora Legacy Project is to work with the Linux community to provide security and critical bug fix errata packages for select End of Life Red Hat Linux and Fedora Core distributions. This will allow for a longer effective life for those releases."
After all, the above goes counter to a lot of the comments expressed here today. Notably the ones about "test it yourself" and "expecting anything else is unrealisticaly wrong."
This is still valid, unless you assume that the updates for EOL distributions are useless unless they are very rigorously tested under industry-grade circumstances.
A lot of people obviously disagree with that notion, so the text is correct.
If you have constructive wording suggestion without the abovementioned assumption, I'm sure we'd like to hear it..
-- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
-- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
