> -----Original Message----- > John Jasen spoke: > > > The same goes for RH9 which we have installed. Though not a > server-only > > distro it's possibly the best of all the old Pro series (and yes, we > > paid full price for it too) and is the acknoledged basis > for the first > > RHEL version to come out. It's been stable and is as solid > an OS as you > > can find. While we could upgrade to RHEL again the cost its > not worth > > the cost to just replace it when the server has not had a single > > problem. > > Errr ... RHEL 2.1 was based on 7.2, with some 7.3 thrown in ... > Your correct, I had (oddly) forgoten about 2.1. Might be due to the naming change they did after it was released (i.e. from 'Red Hat Linux Advanced Server 2.1' to 'Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 AS') ... or my memory is just going. :p Paul P. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
