On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 21:46 -0500, Marc Deslauriers wrote: > On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 10:40 +0800, Jason Lim wrote: > > Actually, if you're talking about the RedHat Linux distros, the last > > "stable" one was Redhat Linux 9. All the FC ones are being released way > > too fast and frequently to be used on a stable server. > > rh7.0 - released September 2000 - 5 months after rh6.2 > rh7.1 - released April 2001 - 7 months after rh7.0 > rh7.2 - released October 2001 - 5 months after rh7.1 > rh7.3 - released May 2002 - 7 months after rh7.2 > rh8.0 - released September 2002 - 4 months after rh7.3 > rh9 - released March 2003 - 6 months after rh8.0 > fc1 - released September 2003 - 6 months after rh9 > fc2 - released May 2004 - 8 months after fc1 > fc3 - released November 2004 - 6 months after fc2 > fc4 - projected to be released in May 2005 - 6 months after fc3 > > I don't see FC being released faster than RHL used to be. What makes you > think it's any less stable? Pound for pound (or more accurately package for package), I think RH7 holds the gold for length of release cycle per package. -Jim P. -- fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
